Home

Failing to plan is simply planning to fail

Leave a comment


Obama wants to admit Muslim refugees from war torn Syrian without any reasonable assurance that they are not terrorist or have received training in one of their training camp.  Even the Director’s of Home Land Security and the CIA are both saying we don’t have a vetting system robust enough to preclude terrorist entry.

Additionally there is the problem of refusing the admittance of an American citizen if we know for a fact that he or she was trained in one of those camps.  If only 1% of those admitted from ISS controlled territory how many would become “home grown terrorist”?  If you watched the recent videos or saw the pictures of the refugees being let through the gate and see all those young men running pass that elderly woman carrying a child that must weight 40 pound or more it is a prime example of their attitude towards women.

I might be mistaken but I believe that 28 states have said they will not accept them, but my question is how we would prevent their migration into our states if they are brought in.  Almost every one of these states, especially in the south and on the west coast has “Sanctuary Cities” as well as known ‘radical Muslim’ training camps. Short of closing the State borders and possible requiring positive residential ID with random police check points. 

This could also be the way that Obama wants to insure his ‘reign’ by causing a massive upheaval of violence just before the election then closing down the election process do to a National Emergency and declaring “Martial Law” in those states ‘in rebellion’ to his Exulted Executive Mandate allowing him and his administration to remain in Office without an election.  Another ploy that he may have on his agenda is if Clinton is elected have her arrested for treason based upon the FBI report and others now coming out and nullify by Executive Order the election results.  If that happens until there is another election he will remain in office as the “de facto” President, care to venture a guess as to how long that might be? 

Now following up with the terrorist search in Belgium their government has said they do not have enough police to carry out what needs to be done and have brought in Government Troops to assist.  Sound like they are going along the same line of control as France, total government oversight.  I wonder how long it will be before the other European nations “close their border crossings” to all but their citizens, basically turning Europe into a closed nation.  But that leads to the next question, what they will do with the Muslims, especially those from Syria who are currently living in their countries.

What would it take to have a mass combined European dislocation policy of all Muslims, back into their country of origin. Just think about England, Spain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy all unilaterally gathering up all Muslims for mandatory deportation back into their original homelands.  Can’t you just hear the up-roar from the Muslim nations who say that they will not allow their former citizens to return?  There might be one good outcome, that might be the catalyst necessary to dissolve the U.N.

Now my thoughts on why Obama refuses to say the words “radical Islam.” I didn’t originate this, but I ask: do we now have or are we on the road to having a Muslim government with Sharia Law quick to follow?

  • John Brennan, head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia, and he took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible. 
  • Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim born in Iran where her parents still live. 
  • Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim. 
  • Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim. 
  • Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.
  • Obama’s Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim. 
  • Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships Czar, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.
  • It’s questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. It is not disputed that He did not repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution, but later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private.  If that is true than the first part is true as well.
  • Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur’an
  • Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government. 

Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East. Remember the “homage” that Obama gave the ruling head of Saudi Arabia – he bowed to him.  The more damage Obama does and is allowed to get away with, the more arrogant he becomes! Our nation and our government have been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us.  Yet today many Americans continue to repeat the “demonic doctrine that Islam is a peaceful religion” and that a Muslim can be a good American.  How about we test that statement:

CAN A MUSLIM BE A GOOD AMERICAN?

Here are answers given to specific elements that are applicable to every individual’s life as it would pertain to a Muslim explained by a person worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. 

  • Theologically – No because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia
  • Religiously – No because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam     (Quran 2:256)
  • Scriptural – No because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran
  • Geographically – No his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns to in prayer five times a day
  • Socially – No his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews
  • Politically – No because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and the destruction of America, the great Satan
  • Domestically – No he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)
  • Intellectually – No he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt
  • Philosophically – No because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression.  Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist, every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic
  • Spiritually – No because when we declare ‘one nation under God’, the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly Father, nor is he ever called love in any of the Quran’s 99 excellent names he is known by

So do we trust them, how can they be both a ‘good Muslim’ and ‘good American’.  Call it what you wish it is still the truth.  America, Israel, and the remaining NON ISLAMIC world is currently fighting for our lives against this Demonic Religious.  A war with a total worldwide scope of removing all other religions and with the specific goals of obliterating the “Little Satan Israel” from the face of the Earth and utterly destroying the “Great Satan America”. 

I guess the next question for my readers is: What are your plans? Will you bow in homage to Allah and Islam or will you resist the Demonic Ideology called Islam masquerading as a religion?  If you do not want to bow down in servitude I have prepared a 44 page survival hand-out specifically geared to Christian Fellowships, Churches, or groups.  I will be happy to send it to you upon request it is in a Word File format.

Paul

Advertisements

Muslim Woman Issues Chilling Warning to the West about Dangers of Islam

Leave a comment


Not an ISIS type warning.

Not even a threat of any kind.

A Muslim woman from Egypt has written an open letter to the western world warning us of what Islam is really like… and what it does to a society. And yes, it goes beyond the unflattering nature of the burka.

This brave woman, Magda Borham (whose name was changed for purposes of safety), wrote a scathing exposé of life under Islam. Every American should read it:

Islam is not like any other religion. Islam is a supremacist racist political and social ideology wrapped in a thin peel of religious rituals. It seeks domination and supremacy over all other systems and religions. Islam is worse than Nazism and fascism systems combined without any doubt.

Worse than Nazism. Worse. Than. Nazism. And Fascism. COMBINED. That’s like, two really bad things together. Yet the left repeatedly calls this the religion of peace, and pro-life people terrorists. So much for priorities.

She continues,

Muslims are in your country, but they live not to integrate or to be part of your society or at least to be equal with others, but to dominate and to be the only privileged group. Muslims achieve this  by turning you into a second class citizen in your own country.

They immigrate to your countries holding the same belief system that turned their lives into hell on earth. This same belief, same religion made their lives unsupportable in their original societies. It is the same religion that transformed their countries into war zones of endless conflicts. Muslims now homeless want to apply this system and live and apply the same destruction in your own country.

Muslims are not in your country to help build it or to make it prosper.  Many believe this, including politicians. Muslims are in your country to drain its resources and to suck the blood out of society. For example Muslims represent the majority of all your country’s welfare recipients.

Get that now? Magda is saying Muslim immigrants and refugees flooding the West have no desire to become part of our culture. Instead, they want to fundamentally transform our society (doesn’t that sound strangely familiar?) and make second class citizens of Americans. Infidels, the lot of you! Muslims have been slaughtering infidels since long before global warming scientists even started surveying the polar ice caps. True story.

A real Muslim’s loyalty is not and will never be to your countries but to the global Islamic “Umma” (nation) only.

At this point please don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that ALL Muslims are bad; but we have no choice but to take care of them all because they ALL believe totally in this evil ideology, but they do ALL believe in an evil man, a warlord, The Prophet of Islam.

There. That’s the key, folks. Of course not all Muslims are evil. BUT, they all believe in an evil ideology invented by an evil man. In case you were wondering, cultures based on Judeo-Christian principles and cultures based on Islamic principles generally…. not good bed-fellows. Which is why the Muslims want to blow us all up. Because tolerance.

Our fundamental beliefs are opposites – because the men who founded each were polar opposites. Allow me to explain

You can read Magda’s letter in its entirety, here: http://louderwithcrowder.com/muslim-woman-issues-chilling-warning-to-the-west-about-dangers-of-islam/#ixzz3oqQ4Ggz3

JESUS VS. MUHAMMAD!! (Qur’an Challenge II)  by StevenCrowder • 1,362,228 views

LIGHT vs DARKNESS

6 Comments


Can there be a union or
melding of Christianity (light) and Islam (darkness)?

Chrislam began in Nigeria in the 1980s, and Chrislamic ideas have spread throughout much of the world. The essential concept of Chrislam is that Christianity and Islam are compatible, that one can be a Christian and a Muslim at the same time. Chrislam is not an actual religion, but rather is a blurring of the differences and distinctions between Christianity and Islam in an attempt to conceive what will become the “One World Religion” of Revelations.

Advocates of Chrislam like to point out that Jesus is mentioned 25 times in the Qur’an, and that Christianity and Islam having similar teachings on morals and ethics. They feel that if the two largest monotheistic religions to unite and the unification will bring about world peace.

While the term “Chrislam” is currently a major buzz word in almost all of the various religious and secular media there is little understanding of the doctrine upon which it is based. Right now what people need to understand what concessions “Christian” denominations and Churches are goint to have to make in order for there to be a “unification” of Christianity with Islam (note I did not say a unification of Islam with Christianity). There is grave danger at the end of this road of appeasement.

What this will require of these denominations and Churches is a renouncing of the basic principles of the Christian Faith and a virtual surrendering to Islam. The Islamic community, locally and internationally, are more than open for Christians to open up their facilities to Muslims. But you can be sure that it will not be the other way around. We will not see mosques placing Bibles within their facilities nor opening up their facilities to Christians, until those advocates of Chrislam swears allegiance to Islam and Allah. This is because it falls within the overall strategy of islamification. The Qur’an maintains that Allah is the only God and that He is sovereign over the entire earth. Hence, He is sovereign over churches and their facilities. It therefore only makes sense that the worship of Allah, as taught in the Qur’an, would slowly extend into these facilities. The end-game, of course, is that churches would transform their doctrines and theologies to conform to Islam. The most crucial doctrine of the Christian faith is rejected in Islam. As a result, the two religions are absolutely not compatible.

Christian doctrines that would have to be set aside:

  • The doctrin of the Trinity
  • The doctrine of the hypostatic union of Christ—where Jesus is fully God and fully Man, two natures in one person
  • That Jesus was the Son of God
  • The virgin birth
  • That Jesus died on the cross to redeem all mankind
  • Jesus was not crucified and His blood has no special significance
  • The doctrine of salvation by faith—that entrance into Heaven is based upon grace and not by personal merit.

Islam adamantly rejects the deity of Christ. The Qur’an declares the idea that Jesus is God to be blasphemy (5:17). Belief in the deity of Christ is considered shirk “filth” to Muslims. Further, Islam denies the death of Christ on the cross (4:157-158).

Chrislam corresponds to the strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood. A senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood, for example, has written: “The ikhwan [Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Hence, this broadly defined strategy sees multi-culturalism and religious pluralism as merely a means to an end. The end is the triumph of Islam over all other religions.

The Christians that are embracing “Chrislam” have taken the position that all doctrine is negotiable and therefore the opening up their facilities to Muslims makes good sense. This attitude, known as theological liberalism, entered the Church in the eighteenth century during the Age of the Enlightenment. Now in the twentieth century it has incorporated the philosophies of existentialism into its understanding of Christianity, accordingly it’s mantra has become unity through and with diversity.

Within the walls of these “churches’ all that truly matters is lifestyle: love, peace, harmony, non-judgmentalism, and the like. Today they even embraced homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle choice, and they are typically pro-choice—that is, they affirm the practice of abortion for women and wish to keep it legal. It only stands to reason that they would now open their churches to Islam, but that will require a serious adjustment in their liberalistic doctrine:

Precepts of Islam that will slowly be integrated into ‘chrislam’ doctrine:

  • Sharia Law will be the only law that is recognized
  • Islam says that all homosexuals must die
  • A woman who has an affair must be put to death
  • Sharia law gives a Muslim man authority to take any (non-Muslin) woman as a sex slave, and it is not consider to be an affair
  •  All women are considered as second class.
  • Any cross or the emblems of any cross must be removed or taken down
  • Any references to the crucifixion, the blood of Jesus, and salvation by faith must be removed.
  • All Jews, Christians and anyone who will not convert to Islam must be killed, and any who do convert will have the status as a ‘Dhimmitude’
  • For their Mahidi (Messiah) to return there must be Islamic Caliphate (Islamic world wide government and religion)
  • Upon the return of their Mahidi, Jesus will also return, not as the Messiah but as a prophet and He will renounce Christianity, and demand the destruction of all crosses

Yet, many churches maintain that doctrine is important. It is neither negotiable nor inconvenient. It is that which defines the Christian faith. Historically, this has been the posture of the church since its inception. Jesus Christ declared: “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). The Apostle Peter added: “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

In the early church, Christians were thrown to the lions because they refused to let go of fundamental Christian dogma, others were crucified, and in medieval Europe, Christians were burned at the stake due to their refusal to recant. It is, as the writer to the Hebrews explained: “All these people were still living by faith when they died…they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them” (Hebrews 11:13, 16). Accordingly, for the church the notion of Chrislam is a spiritual atrocity of the first order.

Yes, Christians are called upon to love all people, including their enemies. But they are also called upon to love God. And loving God requires that He be worshipped aright. Opening up churches to Muslims so that they can worship Allah in a way that reflects Islamic teachings are to disgrace Jesus Christ. It must not be done.

Either Chrislam will ultimately fail or Christianity will become an outlaw religion because Christianity and Islam are diametrically opposed on the most important of issues – the identity of Jesus Christ. True Christianity declares Jesus to be God incarnated in human form. For Christians, the deity of Christ is a non-negotiable, for without His deity, Jesus’ death on the cross would not have been sufficient to be the atoning sacrifice for the sins of the entire world.

Islam teaches that when the prophet “Isa” and the Mahidi return Jesus will also be with them, but he will be a Lieutenant for the Mahidi. Islam teaches that Jesus will openly state that he has been accepted by the Mahidi, that Christianity is a false religion, that he did not die on the cross, and that there is no salvation in his name or thorough his blood. Islam teachs that Jesus will proclaim that he will kill all Jews and Christians who will not convert to Islam. Left unchecked and not challenged with the truth “Chrislam” will be a wedge of destruction that the Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist groups in the U.S. will use to bring about the destruction of our way of life.

  • 2nd Corinthians 6:14-17 Stop forming inappropriate relationships with unbelievers. Can right and wrong be partners? Can light have anything in common with darkness? Can Christ agree with the devil? Can a believer share life with an unbeliever? Can God’s temple contain false gods? Clearly, we are the temple of the living God. As God said, “I will live and walk among them. I will be their God, and they will be my people.” The Lord says, “Get away from unbelievers. Separate yourselves from them. Have nothing to do with anything unclean. Then I will welcome you.”

The rule of law that we now enjoy will become a thing of the past and our nation as we know it will cease to exist. “Chrislam” is a cancer that if it is not stopped will drive the true Church of Jesus Christ underground. At the present time 57% of those who say they are Evangelical Christians have either already embraced “chrislam” and say that they are planning on following this recent trend within their denomination..

This nation was founded upon the principles of Christianity and this new doctrine of demons spawned in the very belly of hell itself called “chrislam” will have to directly oppose those principles for any Muslim to accept or agree with it. True Christianity is now in a fight for it’s very survival, and all those who boldly proclaim that Jesus is their savior and Lord must take a stand against this apostate heretical doctrine that will deny that Jesus is the Son of God, the true Messiah, and that He is the one who purchased our salvation by His sacrifice upon the cross.

The Real Islamic (Sharia) Law

Leave a comment


The great challenges facing America in our nasty and brutish post 9 -11 world are how to interact with Muslim states and if it is possible to integrate Muslim citizens into our open, too often self-destructive, hyper-tolerant cultures. The European model of unfettered Muslim immigration to foster further multicultural
deconstructions of the character of the host societies has now been shown to be a misguided and disastrous error.

Let’s properly judge these organizations:

  • Do they believe in universal human rights – including for women and people of other faiths?
  • Do they believe in equality of all before the law?
  • Do they believe in democracy and the right of people to elect their own government?
  • Do they encourage integration or separatism?

Is this a peace loving tolerant “religion”, or a cruel, brutal, misogynist and intolerant ideology of submission and supremacist that endorse and allows any Muslim man to keep any Non-Muslim woman as “Sex Slaves”. Here, are verses from their “holy book” (the Qur’an) as proof that Islamic (Sharia) Law not only abides, and condones, but provides the Muslim man with the legal authority to have “sex-slaves”. Not one of the verses shown here, from the Qur’an or the Hadith, have been abrogated by any leading Muslim scholar or any of their religious leaders.

Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler) (o9.13) – According to Sharia Law, when a child or woman is taken captive by Muslims, they become slaves by the fact of their capture. A captured woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

The Qur’an: Islam’s Holy Book

Qur’an (33:50)“O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee” This is a special command that Muhammad handed down to himself, allowing himself virtually unlimited sex. Others are limited to four wives, but may also have sex with an unlimited number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:

Qur’an (23:5-6)“..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…” This verse allows the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves. See (Qur’an 70:29-30)

Qur’an (4:24)“And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

Qur’an (8:69)“But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good” A reference to war booty, of which
slaves were a part. The Muslim slave master may enjoy his “catch” because (according to verse 71) “Allah gave you mastery over them.”

Qur’an (24:32)“And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves…” Breeding slaves based on fitness.

Qur’an (2:178)“O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female.” The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman’s worth is also distinguished from that of a man’s).

Qur’an (16:75)“Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favors from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah.” Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah’s will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah’s gifts on slaves – those whom the god of Islam has not favored).

The Hadith: The Hadith to be essential supplements to and clarifications of the Qur’an, Islam’s holy book, as well as in clarifying issues pertaining to Islamic jurisprudence by an overwhelming majority of Muslims. From the Hadith:

Bukhari (80:753)“The Prophet said, ‘The freed slave belongs to the people who have freed him.'”

Bukhari (52:255) – The slave who accepts Islam and continues serving his Muslim master will receive a double reward in heaven.

Bukhari (41.598) – Slaves are property. They cannot be freed if an owner has outstanding debt, but rather used to pay off the debt.

Bukhari (62:137) – An account of women taken as slaves in battle by Muhammad’s men after their husbands and fathers were killed. The women were raped with Muhammad’s approval.

Bukhari (34:432) – Another account of females taken captive and raped with Muhammad’s approval. In this case it is evident that the Muslims intend on selling the women after raping them because they are concerned about devaluing their price by impregnating them. Muhammad is asked about coitus interruptus.

Bukhari (47.765) – A woman is rebuked by Muhammad for freeing a slave girl. The prophet tells her that she would have gotten a greater heavenly reward by giving her to a relative (as a slave).

Bukhari (34:351) – Muhammad sells a slave for money. He was thus a slave trader.

Bukhari (72:734) – Some contemporary Muslims in the West, where slavery is believed to be a horrible crime, are reluctant to believe that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad. In this case, the slave is of African descent.

Muslim 3901 – Muhammad trades away two black slaves for one Muslim slave.

Muslim 4112 – A man freed six slaves on the event of his death, but Muhammad reversed the emancipation and kept four in slavery to himself. He cast lots to determine which two to free.

Bukhari (47:743) – Muhammad’s own pulpit – from which he preached Islam – was built with slave labor on his command.

Bukhari (59:637)“The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, ‘Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?’ When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, ‘O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus.'” Muhammad approved of his men having sex with slaves, as this episode involving his son-in-law, Ali, clearly proves. This Hadith refutes the modern apologists who pretend that slaves were really “wives,” since Muhammad had forbidden Ali from marrying another woman as long as Fatima (his favorite daughter) was living.

Abu Dawud (2150) – “The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Qur’an 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.'” This is the background for verse 4:24 of the Qur’an. Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but allows it to even be done in front of their husbands.

Ibn Ishaq (734) – A slave girl is given a “violent beating” by Ali in the presence of Muhammad, who does nothing about it.

Ibn Ishaq (693) – “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” Muhammad trades away women captured from the Banu Qurayza tribe to non-Muslim slave traders for property. (Their men had been executed after surrendering peacefully without a fight).

The adherents of “Chrislam” and other who advocate the need for ‘political correctness” without considering the consequences will refer to their Muslim friends who are kind and gentle and forswear violence and, most importantly, would “never do jihad” as illustrations and even proof of the “true Islam.” Such inevitably unhappy and frustrated folk reference the now failed assertion that Islam has been hijacke  (by terrorists and killers) and that “true Islam” is “the religion of peace.” How much easier things would be if only they were right. But, they’re not.

The kind Muslim friend, a friend of kafirs/non-Muslims, may well be a “good person” and forswear jihad, but this is not what being a “good Muslim” is about. Allah and Mohammed both command that all adherents of Islam (slaves of Allah); all those who have “submitted” must participate in jihad and/or support those who do. To abjure this obligation for jihad is considered a grave sin with serious consequences.

Consider what Jihad is. It is war, with open violence, or through deception and fraud, against non-Muslims everywhere forever until the entire world is under Islamic rule and Allah’s religion is the only religion on the planet.

Mohammed’s mission was to convert the earth to Islam. It would also be considered to have been a successful Jihad when a people, or nation surrendering without violence their sovereignty to be subjugate under Islamic rule and Sharia Law. This then gives any Muslim man the legal authority to take ANY WOMAN he wants and make her his “Sex Slave”. Unless we stop this insaneness that is being perpetrated upon this nation by the media, our government, the academic elitist, and Chrislam proponents, we will become subject to Islamic Totalitarian Rule and Ideology as a “Dhimmitude” or a     sub-human, one with no more rights than cattle.

%d bloggers like this: