Home

Failing to plan is simply planning to fail

Leave a comment


Obama wants to admit Muslim refugees from war torn Syrian without any reasonable assurance that they are not terrorist or have received training in one of their training camp.  Even the Director’s of Home Land Security and the CIA are both saying we don’t have a vetting system robust enough to preclude terrorist entry.

Additionally there is the problem of refusing the admittance of an American citizen if we know for a fact that he or she was trained in one of those camps.  If only 1% of those admitted from ISS controlled territory how many would become “home grown terrorist”?  If you watched the recent videos or saw the pictures of the refugees being let through the gate and see all those young men running pass that elderly woman carrying a child that must weight 40 pound or more it is a prime example of their attitude towards women.

I might be mistaken but I believe that 28 states have said they will not accept them, but my question is how we would prevent their migration into our states if they are brought in.  Almost every one of these states, especially in the south and on the west coast has “Sanctuary Cities” as well as known ‘radical Muslim’ training camps. Short of closing the State borders and possible requiring positive residential ID with random police check points. 

This could also be the way that Obama wants to insure his ‘reign’ by causing a massive upheaval of violence just before the election then closing down the election process do to a National Emergency and declaring “Martial Law” in those states ‘in rebellion’ to his Exulted Executive Mandate allowing him and his administration to remain in Office without an election.  Another ploy that he may have on his agenda is if Clinton is elected have her arrested for treason based upon the FBI report and others now coming out and nullify by Executive Order the election results.  If that happens until there is another election he will remain in office as the “de facto” President, care to venture a guess as to how long that might be? 

Now following up with the terrorist search in Belgium their government has said they do not have enough police to carry out what needs to be done and have brought in Government Troops to assist.  Sound like they are going along the same line of control as France, total government oversight.  I wonder how long it will be before the other European nations “close their border crossings” to all but their citizens, basically turning Europe into a closed nation.  But that leads to the next question, what they will do with the Muslims, especially those from Syria who are currently living in their countries.

What would it take to have a mass combined European dislocation policy of all Muslims, back into their country of origin. Just think about England, Spain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy all unilaterally gathering up all Muslims for mandatory deportation back into their original homelands.  Can’t you just hear the up-roar from the Muslim nations who say that they will not allow their former citizens to return?  There might be one good outcome, that might be the catalyst necessary to dissolve the U.N.

Now my thoughts on why Obama refuses to say the words “radical Islam.” I didn’t originate this, but I ask: do we now have or are we on the road to having a Muslim government with Sharia Law quick to follow?

  • John Brennan, head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia, and he took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible. 
  • Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim born in Iran where her parents still live. 
  • Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim. 
  • Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim. 
  • Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.
  • Obama’s Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim. 
  • Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships Czar, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.
  • It’s questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. It is not disputed that He did not repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution, but later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private.  If that is true than the first part is true as well.
  • Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur’an
  • Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government. 

Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East. Remember the “homage” that Obama gave the ruling head of Saudi Arabia – he bowed to him.  The more damage Obama does and is allowed to get away with, the more arrogant he becomes! Our nation and our government have been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us.  Yet today many Americans continue to repeat the “demonic doctrine that Islam is a peaceful religion” and that a Muslim can be a good American.  How about we test that statement:

CAN A MUSLIM BE A GOOD AMERICAN?

Here are answers given to specific elements that are applicable to every individual’s life as it would pertain to a Muslim explained by a person worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. 

  • Theologically – No because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia
  • Religiously – No because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam     (Quran 2:256)
  • Scriptural – No because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran
  • Geographically – No his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns to in prayer five times a day
  • Socially – No his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews
  • Politically – No because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and the destruction of America, the great Satan
  • Domestically – No he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)
  • Intellectually – No he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt
  • Philosophically – No because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression.  Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist, every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic
  • Spiritually – No because when we declare ‘one nation under God’, the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly Father, nor is he ever called love in any of the Quran’s 99 excellent names he is known by

So do we trust them, how can they be both a ‘good Muslim’ and ‘good American’.  Call it what you wish it is still the truth.  America, Israel, and the remaining NON ISLAMIC world is currently fighting for our lives against this Demonic Religious.  A war with a total worldwide scope of removing all other religions and with the specific goals of obliterating the “Little Satan Israel” from the face of the Earth and utterly destroying the “Great Satan America”. 

I guess the next question for my readers is: What are your plans? Will you bow in homage to Allah and Islam or will you resist the Demonic Ideology called Islam masquerading as a religion?  If you do not want to bow down in servitude I have prepared a 44 page survival hand-out specifically geared to Christian Fellowships, Churches, or groups.  I will be happy to send it to you upon request it is in a Word File format.

Paul

Advertisements

A Biblical Perspective on Armed Self-Defense

Leave a comment


As a Christian, Apostolic Teacher, and former Pastor, I am asked a lot of questions about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I have always been a Second Amendment supporter.  In light of recent National and International Terrorist attacks I have found myself in more open discussions concerning guns. Many of the questions and discussions have centered on whether or not it is appropriate for Christians to use guns in the defense of their lives and the lives of their families, friends, and other innocents.  I have always believed that it is appropriate for a Christian to defend innocent life. Not only is it appropriate, it is their obligation. How that defense happens is perhaps the question of many.

In order to give an apologetic (defense) answer, I feel that I need to define a couple phrases. Almost inevitably, someone asking the question about deadly force in reference to guns, will use the phrase “shoot to kill”. That phrase seems to come with a lot of assumptions and attitude behind it. That negative connotation is expressed, especially when in reference to property and protecting the “stuff” in life (not people).  In  my Concealed Handgun License classes in Florida this was brought up and discussed.  The point is that there are many circumstances surrounding protection of property, and “what if” questions are always abundant. The main point, to me is about the threat and the circumstances around the threat towards yourself and other innocents.

The other phrase though should be more common than deadly force, or shoot to kill is: “shoot to stop the threat”. Shooting to stop the threat is much less ominous, and in fact more appropriate for all cases when you need to react to that threat.  Before continuing remember that all states treat various situations differently (unfortunately), and you need to be completely and fully aware of your state’s (and sometimes even city) laws and eccentricities when it comes to owning, carrying and using a firearm.

  • In Psalm 82:4 (Lexham English Bible) it says that we are to “Rescue the helpless and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.”
  • Nehemiah 4:14b (LEB) we are told to “…fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your houses.” These passages and others in like contextual reference, show us that we are required by biblical principles to defend innocent life, be it our families or merely the “helpless and needy”.

This defense is especially compelling when it comes to our own household.

  • I Timothy 5:8 (LEB) states that “…if someone does not provide for his own relatives, and especially the members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”  In New and Old Testament scriptures we find command in reference to providing for the defense and safety of our loved ones?

Now that we have mentioned defending yourself, loved ones and innocents, how this is accomplished in our fallen world is the next phase. I believe that scripture is clear that we can not only arm ourselves in response to life threatening situations; but skill at arms is presented in a positive light as well. We are expected to have the tools and to acquire the skills needed to fulfill our obligation in protecting innocents from the evil that is loose in the world.  This is clearly demonstrated Psalms:

  • Psalm 144:1 (LEB) “Blessed be Yahweh, my rock, the one who trains my hands for battle, my fingers for war—” and again in
  • Psalm 18:34 (LEB) “He trains my hands for war, so that my arms can bend a bow of bronze.”

Yes, thee is the context of war, and not self-defense, but he the Lord’s teaching if focused on the training and the center of faith of being prepared in the proper use of arms.

  • Luke 11:21-22 (LEB) tells us that “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his possessions are ⌊safe⌋. But when a stronger man attacks him and conquers him, he takes away his full armor in which he trusted and distributes his plunder.”

This passage of scripture not only allows specifically for armed defense, but serves as a model for what we refer to as the Castle (your home is your “castle”) Doctrine. The peoples of the New Testament were fully aware of our lost and fallen world.  So, for me, stopping the threat is something that is part of my worldview and awareness of what’s around me. The most grand and exotic worldly possessions do not have the value of any human life. I would probably not use deadly force in defense of property, but I would not hesitate to stop the threat, to save the lives of family and innocents. Home invasions are not uncommon and having armed intruders is reason for defense and an attitude of wanting to stop the threat. Make no mistake, malicious people are in the fallen-world these days, in droves.

This “stop the threat” way of thinking is supported by scripture. On the other hand, we see clearly that murder is not permissible, but we should also understand that not all killing is the same as murder. Biblically speaking, we see that if the break-in occurs in light of day, deadly force is not automatically mandated. The point here, as I mentioned previously is that deadly force is not commanded simply to defend property. It shows that in the light of day it is possible to discern whether or not the intent of the malicious person(s) run deeper than mere theft. Today, as in Exodus-Bible-days, thieves who would enter your home under cover of night often have intentions that include violence, home invasions stand out in my mind. In the dark it must be assumed that there is a deeper level of threat and stopping the threat with deadly force can be an acceptable response.

The New Testament affords fewer references to arms and an armed defense. But Jesus does give us some insights into his thoughts on the matter:

  • Luke 22:35–39 (LEB) 35 And he said to them, “When I sent you out without a money bag and a traveler’s bag and sandals, you did not lack anything, did you?” And they said, “Nothing.” 36 And he said to them, “But now the one who has a money bag must take it, and likewise a traveler’s bag. And the one who does not have a sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37 For I tell you that this that is written must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was counted with the criminals.’ For indeed, what is written about me ⌊is being fulfilled⌋.” 38 So they said, “Lord, behold, here are two swords!” And he said to them, “It is adequate.” 39 And he went away and proceeded, according to his custom, to the Mount of Olives, and the disciples also followed him.

We see that Jesus wished for at least some of the Disciples to be armed, presumably for the purposes of defense. It is Important to note that the sword was the “assault rifle” of the day, so Jesus not only wanted his men armed but well-armed. Even when Jesus allowed himself to be taken by the Pharisees, and stopped his disciples from using their weapons to defend Him, he did not condemn arms.

  • John 18:10–11 (LEB) 10 Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his right ear. (Now the name of the slave was Malchus.) 11 So Jesus said to Peter, “Put the sword into its sheath! The cup that the Father has given me—shall I not drink it?”

Simon Peter was told to sheath his blade, not to abandon or relinquish it. Armed defense, although appropriate at times, was the path that Jesus wanted to follow at the moment. He had other things to do on our behalf, but that is another story.

Is it appropriate for Christians to keep arms for the purpose of defending innocent life from evil people in this currently, fallen world? It is. God in his infinite wisdom has seen to it that we are cleared to use this option should it be necessary. There is no inconsistency in followers of Christ, while striving for peace, using arms when called upon to do so. The use of deadly force to stop the threat is a tremendous responsibility though. One that should not be entered into in any but the most pressing of circumstances.

There are some home defense points and comments that I would also like to make that are part of the overall relationship in stopping a threat. The first thing I want to say is that whether your state laws require a permit or license and you have had training, owning a firearm does not make you invulnerable. Many times, especially people that choose to legally carry a firearm, tend to think that because they have this tool, that it will somehow keep them from violence. That way of thinking is a false dichotomy and incorrect. Every situation is different and always being aware of your surroundings should always be kept in the forefront of your mind.

Some firearms owners believe that a pistol is only there to help them “fight their way to their rifle or shotgun”. This too, is an incorrect perception of firearms in actual use. The majority of gun fights start and finish in less than 20 seconds. And they’re even more likely to be over in 10 seconds or less. As with any other tool, you should try to master it. Training and practice will help to make every shot count. Train and practice at every opportunity you get.

Training isn’t merely shooting paper targets at the range, though this may be the best available way to practice. Real threats move, and they’re fighting back. Nothing will ever make you 100% prepared for an active threat that needs to be stopped. However, the closer you get to the real thing, the more prepared you’ll be to stop the threat and defend your life and the lives of other innocents.

For firearm owners, there’s talk of something that is referred to as “stopping power”. Don’t let anyone tell you differently, in reality and this fallen and cursed world, there is no such thing as stopping power. It doesn’t really matter the caliber of choice. More often than not, the threat you face, will be on drugs. Illegal/illicit drugs have a way of numbing the mind and senses. There are many stories of drugged up criminals taking over a dozen shots, and still fleeing the scene. With that said, there is something to be said for larger caliber and specially made self-defense ammunition. But the best stopping power is whatever you have that you have trained and practiced with and are not afraid to use to stop the threat.

I really hate to say the next one, but keep in mind your particular neighborhood and where you live. You may want to think about whether you let your children answer the door and at what time of the day. Seriously, most home invasions aren’t initiated by kicking in the door, they generally knock first. And as soon as your child opens the door, they’ve got a hostage… or worse, their first victim. Just something to think about.  Speaking of home invasions, they are not as rare as we might hope. Thinking that it might happen to you isn’t paranoia. There are more than 40,000 of them each year. Just go to Google and type in “home invasions”. The sheer number of stories that pop up will shock you. Again, of course, you will want to know your local area and ascertain your risk or not. The important thing to remember is that your home is your “castle”, and it needs a well-trained, armed, intelligent defender.

What we’re seeing today is not a gun problem; it’s a violence problem, it’s a moral problem; it’s a sin problem. We are witnessing the rapid deterioration of a nation, and Christian worldview. We have lost our moral compass and we have lost the fear of the Lord. When the fear of the Lord decreases, evil increases.  “A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both” (Dwight D. Eisenhower).

One of the Scriptures often used to support banning weapon-use (especially for Christians) is found in Proverbs:

  • Proverbs 20:22 (LEB) – “Do not say ‘I will repay evil’; wait for Yahweh and he will deliver you.”

This Scripture is dealing with vengeance and vigilantism, not self-defense. Those who want to do harm will always find a way around the law. Restricting firearms is not the answer. For the Christian, self/personal defense is not about vengeance at all, let alone vigilantism.

Many people, including Christians misapply some scriptures, because they don’t understand that there is a different sphere of understanding when it comes to the authorities versus, or over and against the individual.

  • “Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled, either by a power within them, or by a power without them; either by the Word of God, or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible, or by the bayonet”. (Robert Winthrop)

As Christians, I believe that we are to seek peace at every turn and not drape the cross with the flag. But what about self-defense and biblical mandates to protect when spouses or children are involved, especially?  The Old Testament offers a plethora of examples, but what about the New Testament?

  • Matthew 26:52 (LEB), Jesus says to Peter, “Put your sword back into its place! For all who take up the sword will die by the sword.”

Interesting scripture, but what you won’t find is Jesus denouncing the sword, instead He clarifies it’s place. When we take premature, emotionally charged action, it may cost us our lives. Then in

  • Luke 22:36 Jesus says, “But now, let him who has a purse take it and also a bag. And let him who has no sword sell his garment and buy one.”

As a Christian, err on the side of peace, but this isn’t always an option. One thing is certain: A sword was for defense. Jesus initially sent them on a peaceful mission trip where they did not need these items, but now Jesus may have been saying, “I was your provision and your safety, and I still am, but I also want you to be prepared … to use wisdom.”

But some may argue, “Didn’t Jesus say to love our enemies, and bless those who curse us, and do good to those who hate us, and pray for those who spitefully use and persecute us?” (Matt. 5:43-48.) Yes. However, these references refer to personal assaults, offenses and character assassinations. It is a quantum leap to believe that Jesus is saying, “Do good to those who are trying to physically harm your family.”

Paul tells Timothy that if “any do not care for their own, and especially for those of their own house, they have denied the faith and are worse than unbelievers” (1 Tim. 5:8). But those who seek to protect their family, which is often a greater responsibility (if not equal), are often labeled war-mongers, violent and accused of misapplying the Scriptures, if they believe in having and training to use a gun.

The Scriptures must be read in their totality. For example, when Jesus was slapped, He didn’t turn the other cheek. He said, “If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil, but if well, why do you strike me?” (John 18:23). Although we are to err on the side of grace and peace, there is a time and a place for confrontation and protection.  Understand that I’m not advocating violence or aggression; I’m advocating scriptural consistency and continuity. Context is the key factor here. Forgiving is not being passive, and granting grace is not being gullible.

Are we called to guard our families spiritually, emotionally and financially but not physically? This makes no sense. However, my concern with the current gun debate is that we are buying into the fear frenzy. A minimizing of sovereignty is directly related to a magnifying of worry.

  • “Most Christians salute the sovereignty of God but believe in the sovereignty of man” (R.C. Sproul).

Many are prepared militarily but not spiritually, instilling unhealthy fear in their families. We are putting the fear of man into them rather than the fear of God. I hear all about Colt, Glock, Smith and Wesson and Remington, but little about brokenness, surrender to God and humility.  Our gun safes are full, but our prayer closets are empty. This is the real problem—we need to spend less time listening to and watching conservative talking-heads, and more time reading Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

Every time God’s people trusted in their weapons and armies, He called them to repentance. Our protection is in daily submission to Him.

  • Psalm 121:1-3 adds: “I will lift up my eyes to the hills, from where does my help come? My help comes from the Lord, who made heaven and earth. He will not let your foot slip; He who keeps you will not slumber.”

Our current trend beckons us to be very careful about who, or what, we “worship.” Who, or what, we place our trust in.

This is an article, which I have taken some literary freedom with, but which I believe is a very timely article for today’s Christian.

The article was written by: Brent Hoefling·Tuesday, December 22, 2015

 

The Real Islamic (Sharia) Law

Leave a comment


The great challenges facing America in our nasty and brutish post 9 -11 world are how to interact with Muslim states and if it is possible to integrate Muslim citizens into our open, too often self-destructive, hyper-tolerant cultures. The European model of unfettered Muslim immigration to foster further multicultural
deconstructions of the character of the host societies has now been shown to be a misguided and disastrous error.

Let’s properly judge these organizations:

  • Do they believe in universal human rights – including for women and people of other faiths?
  • Do they believe in equality of all before the law?
  • Do they believe in democracy and the right of people to elect their own government?
  • Do they encourage integration or separatism?

Is this a peace loving tolerant “religion”, or a cruel, brutal, misogynist and intolerant ideology of submission and supremacist that endorse and allows any Muslim man to keep any Non-Muslim woman as “Sex Slaves”. Here, are verses from their “holy book” (the Qur’an) as proof that Islamic (Sharia) Law not only abides, and condones, but provides the Muslim man with the legal authority to have “sex-slaves”. Not one of the verses shown here, from the Qur’an or the Hadith, have been abrogated by any leading Muslim scholar or any of their religious leaders.

Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler) (o9.13) – According to Sharia Law, when a child or woman is taken captive by Muslims, they become slaves by the fact of their capture. A captured woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

The Qur’an: Islam’s Holy Book

Qur’an (33:50)“O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee” This is a special command that Muhammad handed down to himself, allowing himself virtually unlimited sex. Others are limited to four wives, but may also have sex with an unlimited number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:

Qur’an (23:5-6)“..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…” This verse allows the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves. See (Qur’an 70:29-30)

Qur’an (4:24)“And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

Qur’an (8:69)“But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good” A reference to war booty, of which
slaves were a part. The Muslim slave master may enjoy his “catch” because (according to verse 71) “Allah gave you mastery over them.”

Qur’an (24:32)“And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves…” Breeding slaves based on fitness.

Qur’an (2:178)“O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female.” The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman’s worth is also distinguished from that of a man’s).

Qur’an (16:75)“Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favors from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah.” Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah’s will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah’s gifts on slaves – those whom the god of Islam has not favored).

The Hadith: The Hadith to be essential supplements to and clarifications of the Qur’an, Islam’s holy book, as well as in clarifying issues pertaining to Islamic jurisprudence by an overwhelming majority of Muslims. From the Hadith:

Bukhari (80:753)“The Prophet said, ‘The freed slave belongs to the people who have freed him.'”

Bukhari (52:255) – The slave who accepts Islam and continues serving his Muslim master will receive a double reward in heaven.

Bukhari (41.598) – Slaves are property. They cannot be freed if an owner has outstanding debt, but rather used to pay off the debt.

Bukhari (62:137) – An account of women taken as slaves in battle by Muhammad’s men after their husbands and fathers were killed. The women were raped with Muhammad’s approval.

Bukhari (34:432) – Another account of females taken captive and raped with Muhammad’s approval. In this case it is evident that the Muslims intend on selling the women after raping them because they are concerned about devaluing their price by impregnating them. Muhammad is asked about coitus interruptus.

Bukhari (47.765) – A woman is rebuked by Muhammad for freeing a slave girl. The prophet tells her that she would have gotten a greater heavenly reward by giving her to a relative (as a slave).

Bukhari (34:351) – Muhammad sells a slave for money. He was thus a slave trader.

Bukhari (72:734) – Some contemporary Muslims in the West, where slavery is believed to be a horrible crime, are reluctant to believe that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad. In this case, the slave is of African descent.

Muslim 3901 – Muhammad trades away two black slaves for one Muslim slave.

Muslim 4112 – A man freed six slaves on the event of his death, but Muhammad reversed the emancipation and kept four in slavery to himself. He cast lots to determine which two to free.

Bukhari (47:743) – Muhammad’s own pulpit – from which he preached Islam – was built with slave labor on his command.

Bukhari (59:637)“The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, ‘Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?’ When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, ‘O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus.'” Muhammad approved of his men having sex with slaves, as this episode involving his son-in-law, Ali, clearly proves. This Hadith refutes the modern apologists who pretend that slaves were really “wives,” since Muhammad had forbidden Ali from marrying another woman as long as Fatima (his favorite daughter) was living.

Abu Dawud (2150) – “The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Qur’an 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.'” This is the background for verse 4:24 of the Qur’an. Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but allows it to even be done in front of their husbands.

Ibn Ishaq (734) – A slave girl is given a “violent beating” by Ali in the presence of Muhammad, who does nothing about it.

Ibn Ishaq (693) – “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” Muhammad trades away women captured from the Banu Qurayza tribe to non-Muslim slave traders for property. (Their men had been executed after surrendering peacefully without a fight).

The adherents of “Chrislam” and other who advocate the need for ‘political correctness” without considering the consequences will refer to their Muslim friends who are kind and gentle and forswear violence and, most importantly, would “never do jihad” as illustrations and even proof of the “true Islam.” Such inevitably unhappy and frustrated folk reference the now failed assertion that Islam has been hijacke  (by terrorists and killers) and that “true Islam” is “the religion of peace.” How much easier things would be if only they were right. But, they’re not.

The kind Muslim friend, a friend of kafirs/non-Muslims, may well be a “good person” and forswear jihad, but this is not what being a “good Muslim” is about. Allah and Mohammed both command that all adherents of Islam (slaves of Allah); all those who have “submitted” must participate in jihad and/or support those who do. To abjure this obligation for jihad is considered a grave sin with serious consequences.

Consider what Jihad is. It is war, with open violence, or through deception and fraud, against non-Muslims everywhere forever until the entire world is under Islamic rule and Allah’s religion is the only religion on the planet.

Mohammed’s mission was to convert the earth to Islam. It would also be considered to have been a successful Jihad when a people, or nation surrendering without violence their sovereignty to be subjugate under Islamic rule and Sharia Law. This then gives any Muslim man the legal authority to take ANY WOMAN he wants and make her his “Sex Slave”. Unless we stop this insaneness that is being perpetrated upon this nation by the media, our government, the academic elitist, and Chrislam proponents, we will become subject to Islamic Totalitarian Rule and Ideology as a “Dhimmitude” or a     sub-human, one with no more rights than cattle.

Hello world!

17 Comments


Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for a lack knowledge

              Paul Whitmore  God’s Green Beret – One of God’s Elite End Time Warriors 
 

I am a retired Special Forces (Green Beret) Command Sergeant Major with two tours of duty in Vietnam, and an Ordained Minister as well.  While stationed in Georgia I established three full time Schools of Ministry, two in Georgia and one in Uganda Africa.  I also served as a Pastor for five years in Melbourne, Florida where I wrote my personal Testimony and that of my family attesting to God’s faithfulness in all situations titled “Only Believe“.  Everyone who has read it have told me that it has given them renewed hope and assurance that God is faithful to His word if we “ONLY BELIEVE”.  I have also written “His Body > His Church > Our Purpose” the revelation of the Church that Jesus said he would build, and “God’s Special Forces – Elite End Time Warriors”.

I was commissioned by the Lord Jesus to establish (A.C.T.S.)  Ambassadors for Christ Training School“, a Holy Spirit lead school teaching the members of the Body of Christ how to live and minister as an Ambassador of Christ, a visible representive of the Kingdom of Heaven. There is also advance training for those who wish to become one of “God’s Special Forces”, elite warriors who will be sent into the enemies backyard to pull down all of the strongholds and establish a “Kingdom of Heaven Embassy”.  We offer both regular classroom instruction and live interactive internet instruction as well.

I also conduct Disaster Preparedness Seminars for small groups, Churches, and Fellowships.  The teaching is designed to equip them to be able to safely remain at their currently location under a state of prolonged emergency, or move safely in ‘convoy’ from their current location to another.   I have prepared a  comprehensive “Disaster Preparedness Manual” that anyone may requested.

If you would like to enroll in A.C.T.S. or request other information, contact me at  godsgreenberet@cfl.rr.com.

John 15:6 “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that you should go and bring forth fruit”. 

%d bloggers like this: